A movie made for TV ... I think it sort of shows. But still considering that, it is quite the neat little thriller. If you thought though that 50 shades of grey was to tame (lame?),then don't even think about this one. There is teasing, but considering all this is about it is not as horrific as it could be.

Maybe I shouldn't have compared it to 50 shades ... and I wouldn't mean that story wise anyway. It is more about the sexual awakening of the main female character. Being innocent, yet curious. That may sound more exciting again than what is being shown in the movie. Do not expect this to tickle that .. whaever you want to call it. It is mostly a thriller, that teases a lot ... for better or worse does not go through on some/most of it

I should have known better. The basic plot summary alone indicated that this wasn't going to go well, but yet I watched this. Initially it went well: a fair amount of intrigue and a slick production made me think this might actually be worth watching.

However, it quickly became apparent that this was your average Z-grade thriller, just dressed up as something better. Plot becomes nonsensical, performances are poor: there's nothing going for this.

Avoid.

"Why? Why? Why?" That's what you'll be asking yourself the whole time. Why is the head bad guy doing what he's doing? Why are the bad guys following the head bad guys orders? Why did they run over the one woman? Why did they cast the bad woman and the cousin to look so much alike? Why is the title "Queen of Sin"? She was clearly not a queen of sin. Maybe a pawn of sin. She was more concerned about the one bad guys wife than her own idiotic fiancé. Of which he reminded me of one of Elaine's stupid boyfriends from Seinfeld. Why did the woman run up to the second floor to escape instead of breaking a window on the ground floor when she had the chance? I could continue this review with many more "why's" but it would be too long then and you'll get bored. The biggest "Why" would be "Why did I watch this stupid movie?"