Greer Garson and Walter Pidgeon star in "Madame Curie," the story of the famous scientist.

Actually what is included in the film is quite accurate but much is left out, which is normal. The film begins with the Polish Marie meeting Pierre when she is a student in Paris and shares his laboratory. Both of them are too involved in their science careers to get married, but they fall in love and do marry.

When Marie becomes interested in uranium rays, Pierre gives up his research, and the two work together. It's grueling, disappointing work, but they don't give up. The movie shows just how detailed and difficult it was in their makeshift lab.

This is a beautiful film about a great woman. I happen to think Greer Garson is wonderful, as is Walter Pidgeon. They worked so well together, just as Marie and Pierre did - true partners. Of course, Marie is in her sixties (she died at 66) at the end of the film and looks 90. Typical Hollywood aging - either no aging or decrepit.

Marie Curie, of course, didn't understand the dangers of radium and used to put isotopes in her pocket and in her drawer, and would comment on the light emitted from the drawer. She had several medical problems due to radiation poisoning and eventually died of it, as did her younger daughter and son-in-law. Strangely, her daughter Eva died in 2007 at the age of 103! Go figure. Eva chose Greer Garson to star in the film.

If you want to look at Marie Curie's papers and books today - they are still radioactive and one has to wear protective clothing. Like Marie Curie, they still emit light.

Marie Curie was an inspirational, ahead of her time and important figure, a pioneer in her field while having to deal with and overcome a lot of significant adversity. Her story is a fascinating one as well as complex, and was both intrigued as to whether a feature length would be enough to do it and her justice. It was hard to not say no to seeing 'Madame Curie', as Mervyn LeRoy was a very dependable director who did make some truly fine films (i.e. 'Random Harvest') and the cast promises a lot.

On the whole, 'Madame Curie' was very well done, infinitely superior to the recent 'Radioactive' that had a great lead performance but was mostly very disappointing. It is not easy making an interesting and accessible film of this subject, which absolutely fascinated me but may be too complex and dry for others less familiar with Curie and her contribution to science, but 'Madame Curie' does so admirably if imperfectly. Although it is not perfect, there is a lot to admire.

Will start with what 'Madame Curie' does well. It is impeccably made and produced, with sumptuous sets and costumes complemented beautifully by even more elegant and suitably glossy cinematography. The music doesn't get too melodramatic or over-scored, while still excelling in bringing out the story's emotional core without overdoing it. LeRoy directs sympathetically while still being involved, seldom feeling leaden. The script is intelligent and well meaning, if occasionally rambling.

The story is more respectful to the truth than expected, given the general reputation of biopics straying from the facts. Not only is the personal life element emotionally investable and not soapy, everything with Curie's findings more accessible than expected also. One wasn't too favoured over the other, the characters aren't too sketchy (Curie and Pierre are both interesting) and the film does a far better job than 'Radioactive' at how progressive her findings were, their influence in science and how her mind worked. As well as the extent of the adversity that she faced. The first third is especially entertainingly and sensitively done and the more serious middle act is more serious yet fascinating.

Greer Garson may not look like Curie but her performance is still sincere, forceful and deeply committed. She is great at making Curie an interesting character and a real person rather than an icon or caricature, with so much to admire yet with flaws. Walter Pidgeon is a reliably strong presence, superb in his delivery of the speech to the jeweller, and their chemistry is magic. The rest of the acting shows fine talent giving their all.

It's not perfect, with some very sluggish pacing in the final third. Which also felt too thin, predictable and like the film had run out of steam. Pidgeon is the best thing about this section of the film.

Concluding, very well done and interesting. 8/10.

For their third MGM collaboration, Walter Pidgeon and Greer Garson were cast as Pierre and Marie Curie in this epic biographical drama about the first woman to win a Nobel Prize in science. The Curies contribution to science was a newly discovered element radium which did nothing less than alter how we think about matter itself.

The film carries the story of Marie Curie's life when she was a young student at the Sorbonne from Poland under her maiden name of Sklodowska. The mere fact she was a student there and a brilliant one was highly unusual for women in the 19th century. Her brilliance attracts the attention of young instructor there Pierre Curie, first her mind and then her heart.

Pierre and Marie Curie seem such a perfect fit for each other mainly because Pidgeon and Garson worked so well together on screen. Both got nominations for Best Actor and Actress for 1943, repeating what they had done for Mrs. Miniver in 1942. This was Pidgeon's second and last nomination. They lost to Paul Lukas and Jennifer Jones in their respective categories. The film itself was nominated for Best Picture but lost to Casablanca.

What I like most about Madame Curie is that you don't need a degree in physics to understand what's happening. The actors, the direction by Mervyn LeRoy and the script all are at their best.

Look for up and coming MGM stalwarts like Robert Walker and Van Johnson to play brief roles. Easy to tell why both became stars.

I think Madame Curie and her husband would both have liked the way they were portrayed in this film.