Are All Men Pedophiles?

2013

Action / Documentary / History

Plot summary


Uploaded by: FREEMAN

Top cast

Tilda Swinton Photo
Tilda Swinton as Self
Madonna Photo
Madonna as Self
Doutzen Kroes Photo
Doutzen Kroes as Self
720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
477.94 MB
1280*714
English 2.0
NR
25 fps
12 hr 52 min
P/S ...
887.02 MB
1920*1072
English 2.0
NR
25 fps
12 hr 52 min
P/S ...

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by MartinHafer1 / 10

What appears to be a serious inquiry sure seems to have an entirely different agenda.

I have rarely, if ever, watched a documentary that made me as angry as "Are All Men Pedophiles?". While it sometimes asks very interesting questions, it also seems to have an agenda…and a seriously disturbed one at that. Now I can be open-minded about other opinions, but sometimes being THAT open-minded is really, really stupid…and I strongly suspect most viewers also won't be THIS open-minded.

Are All Men Pedophiles? is a new documentary that just appeared on Netflix. I was intrigued by the title—especially since when I was much younger, I was a therapist in private practice that kept getting pedophiles referred to us as patients. Over time, I felt that much of what I was doing by providing outpatient therapy was a huge disservice to the community, as it gave the false promise that psychotherapy could somehow 'cure' these folks. It also gave the false impression that therapy was often preferable to incarceration. So, it's obvious I have my strong opinions about sexual offending and I was very curious to see exactly what this new film was trying to say.

Well, what it seems to assert is VERY shocking—and provides ample justification for the sexualization and exploitation of children. Arguments the film gives is that in our historical past men often engaged in sexual behavior with children, that it has an evolutionary basis and that successful models used by the media are often under-aged— so men being attracted to young girls is normal. And this is why they appear to argue that pedophilia isn't really a bad thing. It also uses words like 'always' and 'all'—as if to say every man secretly want to engage in sex with children but this seems very dubious to say the least. But this isn't all. The movie also presents stories of pedophiles and victims—ones that many pedophiles will no doubt find stimulating. The film also does something that is not especially helpful nor is in line with recent research about sexual abuse of children. It tries to differentiate between types of pedophiles—as if some are 'good' and others are 'bad'. In fact, they call some pedophiles 'true pedophiles' and others are apparently NOT. What does this mean? And, why make such distinctions? I sure know that if either of my daughters was molested, I wouldn't wonder if it was a 'true' pedophile!!

So is everything about this film awful? No. The film does make a point that television, movies and print media over-sexualize young girls. This cannot be denied. It is also true that ages of consent vary by nation and culture. But to take the leap that sex between teens and adults is somehow acceptable is quite disturbing.

So, if I set aside the messages that the film appears to be promoting is it a well made film? I really don't think so. Too many of their points seemed to ignore evidence to the contrary or anyone with a different opinion. While the film appears to be a scientific and educated inquiry, it often uses opinions as facts and constructs bizarre arguments to promote their agenda. It also seems to ignore emotional damage to victims—especially when often it shows victims who seem to have enjoyed this adult-child sexual contact.

Why did they make this film and exactly who is its intended audience?! I don't know…I just know it isn't something I would ever consider recommending to anyone. And, I wonder why Netflix chose to include this film in their library as opposed to one that might condemn sexual abuse.

Reviewed by Karl Self4 / 10

Jailbait docu

This documentary starts by putting forward the thesis that "all men are pedophiles" because they find girls around the age of 16 sexually attractive while the legal age of consent "in most countries" is 18. To drive home this theory it shows us a bunch of sultry lolitas in frilly frocks. Well, just a quick shufty at the internet shows that a common age of consent doesn't exist and that it's often around 14-16. Simplistic theory debunked, lurid title exposed.

The movie then goes on to briefly discuss the terms pedophilia, infantophilia and hebophilia and the qualifiers acting out / offending and exclusive / non-exclusive. Strangely, some of the interviews are conducted in a glossy, scripted style that is reminiscent of the fake customer testimonials of home shopping commercials ("I've lost ten stone with the fab ab trainer!"). This is dubbed with the heavy Dutch brogue of the director.

This documentaries has a few good interviews, but overall it never lives up to its overblown premise and consequently is a bit of a dud. So, not all men are pedophiles, but we already knew this. The underlying questions, what is pedophilia, why are some (men) pedophiles and how do we deal with it, are neither touched nor illuminated.

Reviewed by hampersnow-289051 / 10

Why was this made ?

At only a bit more then an hour long, not only did this not answer the question, are all men pedophiles, it didn't answer any questions at all. I got nothing from this. It is so all over the place,used so many generalizations that it accomplished nothing . I believe they created that title to get people to watch thinking men were going to be bashed and instead this was like some really bad and boring history lesson on Pedophilia and Hebephilia, which I already knew the difference of. This mess tries to draw some conclusions , but just looking at this film from a technical standpoint, it is not well made. As an American , this is obviously made in Europe with people who speak English only so well, some are hard to understand. People are interviewed and to hide their identity their voices are changed to a point where you can''t understand what they are saying. Some sound extremely scripted. Some funny points were actors portraying cavemen and a little snippet of Showgirls that has nothing to do with pedophilia at all. This was truly awful because it added nothing to an important topic, went off in too many directions and then just ended . It does have a viewpoint which I won't give away as that would be considered a spoiler, but whether you agree with that viewpoint or not, it has nothing to do with the question asked in the title, this is still so poorly made, it even looks cheaply made, that there is no reason to watch it.

Read more IMDb reviews