A Trip to Infinity

2022

Documentary

Plot summary


Uploaded by: FREEMAN

Top cast

720p.WEB 1080p.WEB 2160p.WEB
731.07 MB
1280*674
English 2.0
NR
23.976 fps
1 hr 19 min
P/S 24 / 73
1.47 GB
1920*1012
English 5.1
NR
23.976 fps
1 hr 19 min
P/S 12 / 143
3.55 GB
3840*2160
English 5.1
NR
23.976 fps
1 hr 19 min
P/S 11 / 63

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by paul-allaer7 / 10

Mind-bending musings about infinity (and beyond?)

As "A Trip To Infinity" (2022 release; 79 min) opens, we are introduced to a group of smart, very smart talking heads including mathematicians, physicists, cosmologists, etc. And they start talking about what infinity is. One of them, applied mathematician Steven Strogatz, explains it by way of the story of The Infinite Hotel, as a cartoon plays out what Strogatz is talking about. At this point we are 10 minutes into the movie.

Couple of comments: this is co-directed by veteran documentarian Jon Halperin (who also co=wrote and co-produced this) and newcomer Drew Takahashi. The movie is divided into 9 Chapters and a Conclusion. There is of course no plot to speak of, and along the way we are confronted with seemingly simple questions like "can you go beyond infinity?", "is infinity real or a human invention", etc. The talking heads provide their perspectives, and I haven't a clue whether what they way is true or not. The fascinating thing is that their mind-bending musings are all accompanied by a montage of some sort, at times quite literally (see: The Infinite Hotel),at times very abstract. The original score is an intriguing electronic collage by newcomer Efrim Manuel Menuck. Can't wait to hear more where that came from. Bottom line: this is not your average documentary. I quite enjoyed it for what it was.

"A Trip To Infinity" premiered on Netflix earlier this week. If you are in the mood for something different altogether and don't mind that your brain might get scrambled a bit along the way, I'd readily suggest you check this out, and draw your own conclusion.

Reviewed by charles-limcw5 / 10

Nice Visuals, Weak on Content

As seems to be the norm for Netflix type so-called 'documentaries', visual presentation trumps content depth, breadth and clarity.

Too much on-and-on ramblings on common and minor aspects, and some screen time are just downright irrelevant and totally time wasting - like literally waiting for the train to pass as the interviewee just sat there.

Pertinent and more complex concepts on the other hand are quickly glossed over or just left hanging.

The whole attempt seems to hinge on decorating narratives around the visuals rather than the other way round. Visual quotas seem to be the priority regardless of relevance.

Overall - weak. Only for the very casual viewer of this otherwise highly interesting topic.

For viewers who are already familiar with the rudimentaries of 'infinity' from much better documentaries, give this a miss. Not worth your finite conscious time.

Reviewed by coreyjpier1 / 10

Definition of pseudo science

Quantum is how humans like to compartmentalize and count things. Mother Nature does not do this. She works though Fields, Pressure mediations, centrifugal divergence, and centrifugal convergence. You cannot explain this universe with particles and bumping particles. Quantum does not refer to anything in nature. Quantum is a unit of compartmentalization so that mathematicians who fame themselves to be "scientists" can count things. If they can't count it, they don't believe in it. Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. Atomists = Materialists = Scientism worshiping cult of bumping particles.

Read more IMDb reviews