I can forgive low budget filmmaking and its accompany ills as long the story is well written and told with imagination. Sadly, that is not the case with Vivandiere. For every red smoke cloud billowing out of a cannon to represent blood, there's a poorly shot scene which is set up like a stage play. One example is when the maid is telling the northern woman to not play billiards with her brother's friends because it could threaten his political clout. It is shot entirely from the back. We never get to see the actors' faces.
Historically Accuracy? Regiments were transferred from Virginia to fight in Missouri in 1863 and then back to Virginia. I get it that the filmmakers were trying to include a William Quantrill, but there were guerrillas who committed atrocities east of the Mississippi. They could have easily made someone up.
My main problem is the ending. We see the southern and northern characters reconcile as they flee Confederate authorities. Then the train explodes and the bridge collapses. That's a pretty climactic scene with a resolution. However, the film goes on for another 10 minutes, flash forwarding to the 1870s. The Confederate general, who was a good guy for most of the film, shows up. For some reason the characters know he is there to exact revenge. Revenge for what? Being upset that the girls stole a train engine isn't enough motivation enough. Why was the train so important? Why would the loss of it cause him to be hell-bent on vengeance for so many years? Did the loss of the train result in the death of someone close to him? Unclear. He was going to execute the northern girl's brother because he was caught in a Confederate uniform behind southern lines because that qualified him as a spy. Being upset that a supposed spy got away isn't enough to turn him into a villain. And how do the girls know he is still angry that a prisoner escaped? Southern girl being thrown from a horse the day before so she could have a rifle attached to her leg was convenient. And the final lines of a bleeding old man lying on the floor, "What have you done to me," was just awful. It gives the ending a horror movie feel instead of a period drama. And worst of all, it does not make you sympathetic to the female characters who the film is possible to honor.
The story of women in the American Civil War, especially vivandieres, deserve to be honored with a film. However, this film, especially with its ending, is not the one.
Plot summary
At the height of the Civil War, a fifteen-year-old girl volunteers to become a battlefield nurse -- a vivandière -- with the Confederate army, instantly thrusting her right onto the front lines. She quickly discovers there are horrors beyond what she sees on the battlefield, from guerrilla fighters who kill and loot wounded soldiers and have no qualms about doing the same to her, to the officers of her own regiment, whose cold-blooded wartime calculus makes any promises they offer treacherous and often deadly. But she also finds an unlikely friend and ally - a fellow vivandière with the Union army, her counterpart on the other side. With barely a word exchanged, they discover they share an instinctive code of right and wrong that transcends the causes of the war, and together they will stand up for it with courage, daring, and an unflinching sense of mercy amid massive inhumanity.
Uploaded by: FREEMAN
Director
Top cast
Tech specs
720p.WEB 1080p.WEBMovie Reviews
Learn How To Write An Ending
Maybe a good story but not very well produced
This film needed more work, especially in editing, and a lot more rehearsing to not seem ,ime a stage play. A lot should have been cut, and a lot added- the viewer has to fill in a lot of blank spots, which was too easy as there's nothing very original or creative in this production despite seeming like a good idea. Potential but no fire.