Gee... There are several reasons why this movie is really bad and also a pseudoscience bag full of lies. I don't go to start a discussion here because the righty GOP will upload this as hell, but i will tell you simply. This movie was made by someone who's not trust the WHO and that must or a right-wing pundit or a socialist troll. The WHO has been credible since when was founded, and now, in pandemic times, have been more believable than before, sadly now at the WHO are with their bodyguard because menaced by people who have no dignity and that some of this have watched this junk of pseudoscience and lies.

Ted ''Cancun'' Cruz most love this documentary!

Lilian Franck is correct in her suspicions about the World Harlots Organization, but she doesn't have the necessary fortitude or "killer instinct" for serious investigative journalism. Unfortunately serious investigative journalists have no interest in broaching this taboo topic, because audiences' innate fear of illness makes them blindly & superstitiously worship anyone with "doctor" or "health" in their title. People can't bear any information which reveals health officials to be anything other than the magical perfect angels of their superstitious fantasies, so they always "shoot the messenger" when the topic is mentioned. There is no personal glory or fame to be had for journalists who present this information, which is why they avoid the subject of healthcare corruption altogether. Frank was prescient in making this film right before the charlatans at the World Harlots Organization pulled off the biggest scam in the history of the world (follow the $$$!),but unfortunately she lacks the assertive qualities needed for serious investigative journalism, instead preferring to appeal to audiences' emotions by turning this documentary into a sentimental journey about motherhood. It's unfortunate that a competent documentary about the most corrupt, dishonest & harmful organization in the history of the world was made by someone who, despite her courage in tackling the forbidden topic, had been rendered ineffectual in her goal due to wishy-washy maternal hormones. The ultimate takeaway from this film ends up being that despite all the cultural propaganda traps telling women they should "have it all!" in their families & careers, the truth is that when women choose to have a family, their work will inevitably suffer. Anyone who has ever tried to work alongside women who have children knows this already, their work always takes a backseat to motherhood. When people try to "multitask", they're just doing multiple tasks very poorly & actually accomplishing very little; many behavioral studies have proven this repeatedly, it's not news.

{9/10 stars A}Recommend? Yes; Informative, can share with people who trust government & those who're opening their eyes & seeing government corruption for the first time.

I came across this video on Rumble. This documentary is another example of "you know they're lying because their lips are moving." In the closing scene with WHO Director Margaret Chan she summarizes the contradiction of the WHO, that panders to countries so they'll donate to the WHO which in turn leads to the WHO being influenced by those countries. The WHO is just another bloated bureaucratic organization trying to make itself seem relevant so everyone running it can keep making money.

-1 star: Even though I wore headphones to hear the audio better, some of the background music was a little annoying, poorly placed and made it difficult to hear some people talking. Even while watching on my large laptop, the foreign language subtitles were a little small and difficult to read at times. Especially when the subtitles moved quickly while someone was talking. Few of the subtitles were poorly placed covering someone's name making it difficult to know who was speaking so more can be searched and read about them.

I don't know why someone would be critical of Director Lilian Franck, who's a mom using her concern for her daughter's future, as a reason to investigate the WHO and make this video. Of course the Director isn't an "investigative journalist" but so what? She went out asking questions and ruffling feathers trying to get information and answers, which is more than can be said for most of us. Lilian is only the messenger simply sharing information, what the viewer does with the information is up to them.

Starting at 32:35 the conflict of interest between the WHO and government is brought up. Followed by Bernie Sanders talking about Hillary Clinton having a number of Super PAC's and through those she received $15 million from Wall Street.

This video was released before Bernie Sanders' formed his own "PAC-like" Our Revolution, a nonprofit political organization that functions much like a PAC and doesn't have to disclose it's donors like a PAC. Search for Bernie Sanders PAC to read more, followed by a search for Our Revolution.

May 2021, Sanders' isn't wealthy like many US politicians, but he does own two homes in Vermont and a townhome in DC a few blocks from the Capitol, total for the 3 properties about $1.5 million. Even though he tries to set himself apart from the rich establishment, he's like most other politicians and rich people who're fond of owning more homes than they can use at any one time.

CONTENT ADVISORY: As part of the same segment at 34 minutes a video clip is shown of US Presidential candidate Donald Trump talking about influential people he's donated money to and that they "kiss my ass" because of those donations.

{1=F 2=D- 3=D 4=C- 5=C 6=B- 7=B 8=A- 9=A 10=A+}