Time Jumpers

2018

Action / Sci-Fi

Plot summary


Uploaded by: FREEMAN

Top cast

720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
683.78 MB
1280*714
English 2.0
NR
23.976 fps
1 hr 19 min
P/S 1 / 1
1.28 GB
1920*1072
English 2.0
NR
23.976 fps
1 hr 19 min
P/S 1 / 1

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by NpMoviez4 / 10

Barely okay.

Unlike most of the people, I didn't find this anthology to be cringe-worthy. But, it was completely purposeless. Rather than reviewing this as a whole, I would like to say things about the four disjointed short films in it.

First one. It was the only one which justified the title of the anthology. There were some tropes that we have seen before and they have been played out in a better way and in a better context. It told the story very well, except that the ending was vague. I would've wanted to see more of it. Score : 6.9/10.

Second one. The usual looping of time and stuff. It was nothing exciting and was really predictable. We have seen the thing being played out very well in "Predestination" and many other movies. Here, it's just terrible acting and expositionary dialogues. It didn't make any sense. It felt like a small scene from a movie. Within itself, it had no story. Score : 0/10.

Third one. It was the best one among the four. The way things unfold are told visually rather than through expositions. This would've served as a good short film, if it wasn't a part of this anthology. The telling of the story is very good. The performances are okay. Due to its runtime, it doesn't explain the backstory properly. That's the only major drawback. It just wasn't so fitting to call it "Time Jumping" or so. Score : 8/10. Grade : A-.

Fourth one. This was one of the weirdest things I have ever seen. Mere mentioning of a time leap doesn't justify a "time jump", it will just be lame. It wasn't a horror or a sci-fi stuff. Just some lame video clip. It was shortest and stupidest among all. Score : 0/10 (cringe).

This anthology gave me two watchable short films and two which don't make any sense. I still think that it's a terrible idea to put all these short films in a collection which would make every one of them feel as inferior shorts.

Rating for the entire anthology : 4.1/10.

Reviewed by greg-goremykin1 / 10

How on Earth did 165 voters think this was a 10/10???

This was not just bad, it was epically bad. I barely ever give a film 1/10, most because I think far too many people that didn't enjoy a movie automatically go there (not to mention those that give, say, the latest sequel to their favourite childhood franchise a 1/10 if they didn't like the plot, or too much fan service, not enough fan service, etc.)

Almost every film I can find some redeeming quality, no matter how small or obscure, to merit at least a 2 or 3 or 4 even if I didn't enjoy it, but I searched for anything about this one that I found positive and came up empty handed. Maybe I have a bit of bias I suppose because I'm also ticked off (1) Because the 6/10 IMDb rating with a fair amount of votes tricked me into thinking it was a legit 6/10, and (2) also ticked off at myself for not reading any of the user reviews, and hanging in too long watching this (I only made it to the end of the 2nd story of 4 apparently) thinking the script would tie things together somehow, or... something would happen to make it better.

Avoid!!

Reviewed by armand_rock1 / 10

As others have pointed out gets worst...

The movie started ok (although with bad acting). Then....the story changed to a completely unrelated movie and it went downhill from here.....if you are looking for your time travel movie fix go somewhere else....there are plenty of indy time travel movie gems out there and this isn't one of them.

Read more IMDb reviews