Leo (Joey Millin) in midst of a divorce travels cross country to rescue his addict sister Virginia (Madison West) who claims she is not longer on drugs as she hurls chunks, but is cursed. She explains a cult got her off drugs but bonded her to a man so they fell what the other one feels. She claims she needs to find him. Leo thinks she is still on drugs, but appeases his sister.

The film gives you tidbits to hold your interest as they boringly drive cross country to a climax that left much to be desired.

Guide: F-word. No sex. Ugly male nudity.

The Facts:...Shot on 2 i-Phones...Over 12 Days...Crew of 3. Talk About "Minimalist" or "Primitive-Art".

This Couldn't be More so. Maybe Using 1 i-Phone instead of 2. Or Reduce the Crew to 1. Instead of an Outline, No Paper Reference.

But Seriously, Ever Since the Finding of "Found-Footage" Success, Movies have Achieved What was Only a "Dream" Back in the 8mm/Super-8 Days.

That Being a "Backyard" Effort from Film-Fans to "Make a Movie" and put it Front of an Audience.

"Found-Footage" has Now Seen a "Replacement" Format for those Dreamers. With Little or No Monetary Investment Involved, just Willing, Able, and Ready "Film-Makers with an Idea and Someone Nearby to "Clap-Board" and Say..."Action".

That Being Said, These "Newbie" Film-Makers Might Say a Prayer for Ed Wood whose Most Remarkable Achievement is that He Full-Filled His Dream and Actually Made Movies with Almost No Money.

Considering the Working Conditions Ed Wood Movies are Watchable, Wonky, and Wonderful, One Could Say. That's What This Is...Watchable. Whether it's "Worth a Watch" is a Matter of Taste. Like All Minimalist, Primitive, and Underground Art.

It Takes an "Open-Mind" and an Appreciation. With that in Mind. This Psychological Terror About Drug-Addiction, Cults, and Family Bonding/Relationships was a Treat. Never Boring, and Compelling.

However the Ending is One of Those Left Hanging, and Explanations Not Forthcoming. A Letdown.

After All the Effort in "Getting it Done". An Independent Film, Out of the Gate, Should Never Leave the Audience in Suspended Disbelief because, in The End, it Should End with Applause, Not What the...?

A brother obeys his mother's call to bring his troubled sister to rehab, but the journey leads down an unexpected road ...

Road trip as psychic horror, in the company of two characters who gradually flesh out their relationship piece by piece through off the cuff conversations. The performances are as good as you could hope for, with intimate little barbs thrown in to show a real past shared by the damaged siblings.

This is pitched with sophistication, messing up the story technique to get at deep truths, but I'm not sure it succeeds. It starts out to explore what underlies addiction, with an interesting side angle on the closed circuit of the rehab cult, but by the end includes the brother too without giving a clue on the broadened picture. They both end up confronting the same phenomenon, but it's impossible to say why they should each have suffered the same damage.

I liked this a lot, from the way it introduces the story with incomplete information, scenes that skew reality without going all trippy, pared down scenes that let the audience fill in the details, and the well judged score. The phone camera works well, although it wasn't used much for queasy close-ups. For some reason the back seat angles just reminded me that I couldn't see the characters' faces, and I wondered why not just use the fixed point trick from the bank heist in Gun Crazy, which really gives the audience the sense of eavesdropping on the characters in the front seats.

Some reviews say this isn't a horror, but it does what the best horror does: to put characters who think they have an explanation for what's happening up against the deadly reality, and see how they react. It's just that I couldn't make out the pattern or if there was closure in the end.

I compare this to Unsane, a movie that also uses the phone camera to provide a psychic take on an everyday experience - but in a way that remains aware of what it's trying to convey, and that actually makes the camera - or the view point - part of the story telling.

Overall: Very interesting, but maybe the film makers lack the experience to let the initial theme play itself out.