Based on a stage play entitled "Burnt Offering" by newspaperman turned press agent (for Webber and Fields, Chauncey Olcott and many others),W. Maxwell Goodhue, this is, to say the least, an amazing film noir. Its complex narrative structure anticipates many of the famous classics including Citizen Kane. Nor is the direction by Phil Goldstone (a "B" movie producer who directed only two sound movies of which this is the first) in any way lacking. In fact, it's very inventive, as is the darkly noirish cinematography of Ira H. Morgan (who co-photographed the fabulously spectacular "When Knighthood Was in Flower" in 1922 but whose career declined in the sound period where, except for an occasional "A" like Chaplin's Modern Times, he worked almost exclusively in Poverty Row. He managed to chalk up over 200 credits in all before his death in 1979). The acting too is highly creditable, particularly by Zita Johann in the title role, John Miljan as one of the most repulsive villains ever seen in a movie, Claire Du Brey as the self-centered, antagonistic Mrs. Crawford, and Paul Cavanaugh as the charming but disappointingly weak-willed governor. The only not-so-hot performance is offered by the normally thoroughly professional Alan Dinehart who seems unsure how to play his role. As a result, he simply rattles off his lines and is often unconvincing. In all, however, The Sin of Nora Moran is a must-see item for every film noir fan. Available on an excellent Alpha DVD.

If you look through the reviews for "The Sin of Nora Moran" you'll see that there are a lot of very positive reviews...with scores of 9 and 10. Well, for the life of me, I have no idea why the reviews are so positive...the film is schmaltzy, illogical and cheap...and I only recommend it to Pre-Code film lovers.

The story is told in a very passive manner...a huge strike against it. What I mean is that it begins with an angry wife and her brother explaining to her what sort of sacrifice Nora Moran made to help the angry woman's husband. Then, the story unfolds with flashbacks and narration...and it's a very distracting and poor way of telling the tale. The story involves Nora and her agreeing to be prosecuted for a murder she didn't commit in order to help her married lover.

So, apart from the style, why did I dislike the movie? A huge problem is that the story makes no sense. Why would Nora agree to be executed when she's innocent?! The whole martyr angle, though common in the 30s with films like "Madam X", "So Big" and many others, is just illogical here and makes for a schmaltzy story.

Another problem is that the story is very much pro-adultery...something VERY normal for the Pre-Code era but which seemed a bit sleazy....but not in an enjoyable way (such as in "Red-Headed Woman"). This and the cursing make it an interesting curio...though not an especially good one.

The story really intrigued me on paper, and structurally 'The Sin of Nora Moran' fascinated just as much. Non-linear narratives are not for all but to me this structure has been done very well many times on film. Others have mentioned being drawn into seeing the film from its poster, and no wonder. It is definitely one eye-catching poster that has a real allure that is difficult to resist. So there were no real reservations before seeing 'The Sin of Nora Moran'.

While hopes were extremely high, there was admittedly a little doubt as to whether 'The Sin of Nora Moran' would work well. Having seen my fair share of films etc that had great potential but either doesn't fully live up to it or completely wastes it. Luckily 'The Sin of Nora Moran' did live up to expectations, if not exceeded them, and didn't waste its potential at all. Is it a masterpiece? No. Does it deserve to be seen more and is it a good film? To me, yes on both counts.

A lot works here. One of the most striking aspects of 'The Sin of Nora Moran' is the cinematography, not many pre-code films made this early on in the history of sound pictures had photography this realistic-looking. Stylish and atmospheric absolutely many times, like here, but the camera techniques and the atmosphere created with them was so vivid it was like watching a semi-documentary. The film is very skillfully directed, going at a tight pace while allowing some breathing room, and the scoring and use of sound is not intrusive or over-the-top in my view. Zita Johann gives a very powerful and heartfelt lead performance that makes one care about Nora without making her too obvious.

Rest of the cast do very well too if not quite up to Johann's level with their characters not being as interesting. Alan Dineheart comes off best as the second most interesting character and with some of the film's best lines. In a script that is very thought-provoking with some tense and poignant parts. The film may not look lavish outside of the cinematography, but in my view it does not look cheap and has a suitable amount of grit that suits the bold subject matter well. As well as the cinematography, the other interesting aspect of 'The Sin of Nora Moran' is the structure of the story. A relatively unconventional one at the time, not unheard of but not seen a lot, and an interesting one, not many films at the time had a flashback within a flashback for instance. Also appreciated its boldness, with some ahead of the time themes to address on film and none are sugar-coated. Did find myself caring for Nora and her plight.

Having said all of that, some of the constant back and forth in the first half can feel a little confusing (wouldn't go as far to say that it's illogical though personally) and like one is not quite keeping up always.

Some of it is admittedly melodramatic and schmaltzy early on.

In summary, very good and interesting on the whole. 8/10