Paradise

2016 [RUSSIAN]

Action / Drama / War

Plot summary


Uploaded by: FREEMAN

Top cast

Peter Kurth Photo
Peter Kurth as ObersturmbannfĂŒhrer Hans Krause
720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
1.18 GB
968*720
Russian 2.0
NR
24 fps
2 hr 11 min
P/S ...
2.43 GB
1440*1072
Russian 5.1
NR
24 fps
2 hr 11 min
P/S 0 / 3

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by Horst_In_Translation6 / 10

Paradise may be an illusion, but this film is not

"Ray" or "Paradise" is a Russian/German collaboration that is fittingly for the protagonists' nationalities partially in the French language, partially in the German language and partially in the Russian language, so unless you are really a language talent, make sure you got a good set of subtitles while watching. The film runs for over 2 hours and is the newest work by lauded Russian filmmaker Andrey Konchalovskiy. He had his 80th birthday recently, so he was already alive back then already when the film is set, namely during the days of World War II. This maybe also explains his creative decision to turn this into a black-and-white movie as if it was really made back then. However, it certainly does look too modern for other reasons to make such an impression, at least for me. It's perfectly fine though. I muse say with the exception of supporting actor Peter Kurth, I don't know any of the cast here. Kurth gave a good supporting performance as a ruthless Nazi officer. He was perhaps the only character in this film who was downright evil and did not have any shades to him in terms of black and white. The female central character played by the director's wife Yuliya Vysotskaya (the one who received most awards attention from the cast) was maybe the exact opposite. The two male characters in the center of the story have a great deal of shades to them, even if they may seem like evil guys initially too. They were more thrown into the abyss of the Nazi movement, also for self-protection partially, than really driving forces, especially when it comes to the Holocaust. For Christian Clauss, the German lead actor, it was his very first performance I think and for that it was really impressive. The most interesting part to me, however, was the one involving Philippe Duquesne early on. After he was gone after the first half hour or so, things got slightly worse for the rest of the film I think. It really was the highlight as the story of French collaborators is really one that hasn't been done as often yet as stories about German soldiers or concentration camp inmates. But it is still a good movie I think. Had it managed to stay on the level of the first chapter for the following 1.5 hours too, it could have managed the Oscar nomination and not just made the list of the final nine contenders. Still a pretty good achievement admittedly. This is a definite contender for best Holocaust film of 2016 and I recommend checking it out. The only thing I did not really like about it were the scratching sounds when they jumped a few seconds in these scenes when the 3 protagonists are talking to the camera justifying why they did what they did, which also results in a big plot twist at the very end that I will not go any further into detail now to avoid spoilers. Enough said now. This one's definitely worth watching despite occasional lengths in the second half of the film.

Reviewed by Andres-Camara4 / 10

The documentary part makes it slow

For a long time watching this movie, I'm wondering, what do you intend with the documentary part? I have come to the conclusion that I did not know how to state what I wanted and decided to do so. Actors looking at camera. But to me at least, this makes the film very slow and also makes me lose interest and sometimes lose myself. We have seen Nazi movies many times. This is one of them in which the Nazis, if we did not know about them, would not be bad. You do not see them doing anything bad. If they tell it, but this is cinema and it has to be shown, in a novel it is written, here it is told in image. As it is done as in episodes, it is sometimes cumbersome. Sometimes he loses you.

It has a way of making the plans that surprise me on the one hand today. The camera is fixed and he does not care if the actors leave the screen. Cut bodies, heads, entire characters, it does not matter. He does not care where he puts the camera, he just wants to tell a script and he does not care how.

The actors are very good, it's true. Even children, the little that lets us see their faces, are fine. They convey what the characters have to feel, pity that the director does not know how to pick it up.

The picture is pretty good, in the documentary part, I do not know why those moments are like burning the tape. In the film part too, but when you put a lot of light through the windows, I do not like it, there is a moment when an actor looks like a ghost.

The director, is not very clear about some things. He knows what he wants to tell, but between making tricky episodes and not knowing how to position the camera, he makes the film long and slow.

I think it's a misused movie

Reviewed by Zlatikevichius8 / 10

...

A metaphor of where our decisions and acts may take us: remembered for the good things we've done (in the Paradise) or totally forgotten.

Read more IMDb reviews