Night of the Living Dead: Resurrection

2012

Action / Horror

88
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled5%
IMDb Rating2.5101491

horror

Plot summary


Uploaded by: OTTO

Director

Top cast

Lee Bane Photo
Lee Bane as Kevin
720p.BLU 1080p.BLU
697.79 MB
1280*720
English 2.0
R
23.976 fps
1 hr 26 min
P/S 2 / 2
1.24 GB
1920*1080
English 2.0
R
23.976 fps
1 hr 26 min
P/S ...

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by dadatuuexx2 / 10

Night of the living Dead ?....

Sorry,here,s the spoiler..More like "Night of the living Dead-Beats " !. I see ALL zombie films,from ALL over this planet,good ,and bad,and have been doing so for over 40 years now,and LOVE the subject.However ,i was not so let down when i saw that it was a micro-budget movie,moreover ,that it was lame ,boring ,and quite shoddy!.Watch that last one ,with Jeffery Combs,or the one in 3-d ,w/ ole Sig,at least THEY had zombies that REALLY wanted to eat flesh,not creep around breaking stuff,wilding ,but true flesh eating,human hating desires,not wear my hoodie,and bang on peoples doors in the middle of the nite,till i get my nuts shot off ! i mean,it was an hour and twenty before i really saw much good zombie stuff.Lame story,shoddy acting ,bad effects,poor script ,i could go on,but its pointless......like this movie ! .

Reviewed by paul_haakonsen4 / 10

Night of the Living Dead... wait, what? Seriously?

Well first of all, I don't really understand how this movie could even be allowed to carry the title "Night of the Living Dead", as it was a weak movie in comparison to Romero's timeless classic.

And how the movie have managed to score such a low rating, doesn't really come as a surprise, because this movie was nothing overly impressive. When I first heard about the movie I was thrilled, and had my hopes up. Why? Well, because of the title "Night of the Living Dead: Resurrection", it does have some big shoes to fill out, but it failed horribly to do so.

The story was simple and easy to follow, but it was rather pointless and didn't really peak at any point, and it didn't really throw any bones to the audience - in overall, a very uninspiring movie experience.

For a zombie movie, then there were surprisingly few zombies in the movie. And those that were there, weren't particularly scary, threatening or zombie-like. Apparently when you die, your eyes become shrouded by horribly fake contact lenses. That was just hilarious. The contact lenses they had opted to put into the eyes of some of the zombies wasn't even remotely anything near those milked-over eyes of the deceased - it was party contact lenses at best.

The acting in the movie was nothing spectacular, and it was clear that it was a low budget semi-amateurish movie, because it was like watching inadequately trained stage thespians trying to take their talent to the big screen.

Effects-wise and gore-wise, then "Night of the Living Dead: Resurrection" is nothing spectacular or particularly impressive. It didn't really make much use of either special effects or gore. So for all us gore-hounds, then our depraved cravings is better satisfied elsewhere.

However, for a low budget movie, then "Night of the Living Dead: Resurrection" isn't amongst the worst of low budget movies. There are far more questionable and ridiculous zombie movies out there. Just don't get your hopes up for this movie - as I did - you'll crash and burn fast and hard on this one.

I am giving this movie a 4 out of 10 rating because it was a good-hearted attempt at making a zombie movie on an amateurish level. The movie did have some good points here and there as well, but it just had set itself too far up by brandishing the "Night of the Living" title. Perhaps the movie should just have been named "Resurrection" or something else without the "Night of the Living Dead" title.

Reviewed by Leofwine_draca1 / 10

Sheer awfulness

Next up is 2012's NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD: RESURRECTION, a remake of the George Romero classic from Wales of all places! Sadly from the first scene in which a group of chavs who appear to be the wrong side of 30 ask a guy to buy them booze from their local newsagent you know that this one's going to be a stinker, a literal home movie shot on a low-priced video camera with a minimum of budget and talent. It's a mix of boring dialogue scenes featuring heavy emoting from non-acting cast members and the occasional bit of shaky-cam action. The film offers one novel twist around the 30 minute mark but that's the only good thing here and the rest is just complete tedium as various cast members get zombified and eat others. Truly the nadir of the zombie genre, this makes the likes of BURIAL GROUND and ZOMBIE CREEPING FLESH look like real masterpieces. Contact lenses, bloody mouths and gore are the order of the day here, but it's so cheap and dreadful that none of it entertains.

Read more IMDb reviews