Juarez

1939

Action / Biography / Drama / History / Romance

Plot summary


Uploaded by: FREEMAN

Top cast

Bette Davis Photo
Bette Davis as Carlota of Mexico
Paul Muni Photo
Paul Muni as Benito Juárez
Brian Aherne Photo
Brian Aherne as Maximilian I of Mexico
Claude Rains Photo
Claude Rains as Napoléon III
720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
1.08 GB
968*720
English 2.0
NR
23.976 fps
2 hr 0 min
P/S ...
2.01 GB
1440*1072
English 2.0
NR
23.976 fps
2 hr 0 min
P/S 0 / 1

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by rmax3048237 / 10

Fake News Tricks Archduke!

The story of Archduke Maximilian, the Austrian nobleman who was induced by Napoleon III to assume the role of monarch of Mexico in 1863, displacing Benito Juárez, Mexico's liberal president, played by Paul Muni. His enthronement was endorsed by the wealthy land-holding aristocrats of Mexico -- eighty-five families. The US was too busy fighting its own Civil War to bother with violations of the Monroe Doctrine. Juárez and his armies put up a stiff fight, and eventually Napoleon withdrew his French forces from Mexico. Maximilian and two of his loyal Mexican were captured and executed. Maximilian's wife, "the mad Carlota", was hospitalized in Europe and finally sent to a sanitarium.

The film sticks pretty closely to historical fact, as far as a non-historian can tell. It's gripping. The hero is not Juárez at all but Maximilian. And, as presented here, it's an unalloyed epic tragedy. Shakespeare could have done wonders with it. Brian Aherne is Maximilian -- "Max", as his wife, Bette Davis calls him -- is a dignified man full of good intentions, whose policies (with one notable exception) followed those of Benito Juárez. Both were determined to promote equality and justice in Mexico. Again and again, Max defies the eight-five tycoons in favor of the ordinary people, most of whom can't read or write.

The way Aherne plays Max, he's so gentle and dignified that he's almost effeminate, an impression supported by his hair style, which appears to be braided and coiled atop his head, and by this spectacularly unwholesome looking set of muttonchop whiskers. He believes that the Mexican people have invited him to become their emperor by means of a referendum, not realizing until too late that the referendum was rigged. He's a man of principle tempered by good sense. The ongoing war is nettlesome to him and he sends a messenger to Juárez with an offer to become Prime Minister of Mexico. All that separates them, as Juárez observes, is the word "democracy." Muni plays the character as a pompous humanitarian, full of folksy liberal pieties. Hs movements are slow and deliberate. He overacts underacting. Unlike Max, he's never in doubt about anything, which makes him rather dull. And, in a mistaken attempt to have him resemble the historical Max, make up has turned Muni into a clayish lump. And Muni delivers lines that seem made of lead. "In a monarchy, the government changes the people. In a democracy, the people change the government." Clunk.

Actually, Juárez does seem like a law-abiding populist but he's about as yielding as reenforced concrete. He spurns Max's offer of Prime Minister, preferring war to compromise. Max, on the other hand gives a reasonably good argument in favor of kingship. A king, belonging to no party, owes no one anything and therefore can be impartial, while a president is beholden to the particular forces that elected him.

I called the argument "reasonably good" because Mexico in the 1860s, with most of its population illiterate farmers, may not have been entirely ready for a republic. What followed Juárez was a series of dictators, factional disputes and revolutions, including a raid across the border into the USA by Pancho Villa in 1917. Interesting parallel: When Max's French troops try to fight Juárez's army, that army dissolves into the general population in its own neighborhood. If you can't find them, you can't fight them. Ditto after Villa's raid into Columbus, New Mexico. The US Army sent a large expeditionary force into Mexico to find and punish Pancho Villa and his army. But there was nothing to fight. The soldiers had turned into farmers.

This was released in 1939 and lest we miss the point of dictatorship vs. democracy, the appearance of Archduke Maximilian is accompanied by the strains of "Deutschland Über Alles." Some other notes: Back in the USA, the South wanted to invade Mexico and turn it into a slave-holding nation, while slavery had been outlawed two generations earlier. And some of Lincoln's advisers wanted him to declare war on Mexico to deflect attention from the Confederate victories during the early years of the Civil War. (Mexico as low-hanging fruit.) In the end, the populist movement prevailed in Mexico; the vast haciendas were broken up and the land redistributed to farming families, each of which got enough land to support itself. The irony was that the birth rate became so high that the family farm could no longer feed so many people, so many of the farmers migrated to the cities in search of work, found little, and established the squatter settlements in shacks of corrugated tin and cardboard that now surround Mexico City. That's kind of off topic, an obiter dictum. Let's just say that in this movie, Juárez comes out on top but it's a tragic victory.

Reviewed by blanche-27 / 10

Big actors, small roles

An amazing conflagration of actors populates the cast of 1939's "Juarez" -- Brian Aherne, Paul Muni, Bette Davis, Claude Rains, John Garfield, Gale Sondergaard, Donald Crisp, Gilbert Roland, and Louis Calhern. More amazing is the size of many of their roles - small! It shows that Warner Brothers put everything behind this epic film.

The story concerns the short reign of Maximilian von Hapsburg (Aherne) as Emperor of Mexico, seduced into taking the position by Napoleon III (Rains) who convinces him that the Mexican people want a monarchy. They don't. Opposing Maximilian is the man of the people, Benito Juarez (Muni),who has the support of the United States. Both Maximilian and Juarez want many of the same things, but Maximilian's hard work to unite the Mexican people and stop the fighting fails.

Though the title is "Juarez," the workhorse role belongs to the underrated Brian Aherne, an excellent actor from the theater who took second place to Errol Flynn at Warner Brothers. Though superstardom eluded him, he was a brilliant actor and a handsome man who turned in many great performances during a 43-year career. His Maximilian is gentle, likable, strong, and sympathetic. He gets third billing to Muni and Davis. Davis plays the Empress Carlota, Maximilian's wife. It's a secondary role but she has a huge, dramatic scene when Carlota returns to France to insist that Napoleon III keep his troops in Mexico. One of the best moments in the film is Carlota, going mad and believing the French court is trying to poison her, running out into the night, her white dress slowly disappearing. Davis wears magnificent gowns and has dark hair that seems to emphasize her huge eyes even more. She looks quite beautiful and gives a solid performance as a fragile woman devoted to her husband.

Paul Muni's Juarez is stiff, and he looks and acts as if he's embalmed. Muni was a great actor who delved deeply into his roles, and it's not clear what he was thinking when he gave this performance. Undoubtedly he had researched Benito Juarez to the ground and was giving an exact representation of him. But as Bette Davis once said, "True acting is larger than life." Muni needed something more for this role but doesn't supply it. John Garfield's Porfirio Diaz is odd casting. He makes a little attempt at an accent; underneath that dark makeup is still John Garfield. Supposedly his role was cut down. Back in 1939, audiences were just getting to know him, so his performance probably held up well back then. Nowadays one only thinks, "Why is John Garfield playing a Mexican?" "Juarez" is rich in detail - it occasionally is plodding and runs a bit long in an effort to supply the historic happenings. But it is well worth seeing for the performances, the story, and those Orry-Kelly gowns.

Reviewed by MartinHafer9 / 10

Warner Brothers clearly pulled out all the stops on this one!

When you watch "Juarez", you can't help but be impressed by the care Warner Brothers spent on this film. Apart from a few actors who would have been inappropriate for the picture (imagine Jimmy Cagney in this film!),nearly all their prestige actors are in the film as well as their best supporting actors. In addition, the film looks gorgeous for a costume drama. The only gripe I have is that although Paul Muni looks very much like Benito Juarez facially, he is way too tall to play the 4'6" leader! But I suppose that there wasn't a lot the studio could do about that. However, on the plus side, Brian Aherne is the spitting image of Maximillian!

The story is about the period of Benito Juarez' presidency where he was replaced as leader by Emperor Maximillian (Brian Aherne)....placed on the throne illegally as Mexico's first (and only) emperor. And, it continues until the eventual deposing of Maximillian by Juarez' army in exile.

It begins with the leader and jerk-face of France, Napoleon III (Claude Rains),deciding to take over Mexico and installing a puppet ruler, a Habsburg, Maximillian. He and his wife (Bette Davis) are tricked into believing that the Mexican people actually want them to rule over them. But soon after arriving, Maximillian discovers that he is presiding over a divided nation--some of which is still ruled by Juarez, the rightful president of the republic. And, he also learns that the Mexican people are NOT solidly behind him despite what his advisors had been telling him! While Maximillian tries, in some ways, to be a good leader, he foolishly stays in power....long after all his support has vanished.

The biggest complaint about this film is a modern one. Back in the day, white actors often played all sorts of ethnicities....and here nearly every Mexican is a white person. Such is the way they made films...like it or not today. Otherwise, it's a lovely film...very well made and reasonably historically accurate.

By the way, this is NOT a complaint but more a comment about the cast and script. There are so many wonderful actors in this one that you'd barely notice Bette Davis in the film. She's fine as Empress Carlotta....but the story overwhelms her and doesn't allow for her to show her great acting ability until the final portion. Up until then, she was barely noticeable. As a result, it's not among her best films.

Read more IMDb reviews