I am not sure what the DVD cover has to do with the movie. The story is basically a two man play. Airman Jack (Matt O'Leary) and Lt. Sue Lawson (Eloise Mumford) are stationed together in a remote Nevada site where they monitor Al Qaida activity and take out targets. Lawson is new and doesn't have her first kill while the airman is no stranger to killing.
The film evolves into a discussion of the morality of using drones to kill people, especially when they are surrounded by their family. It is basically a moral play that takes place in a hot desert metal hut with high tech equipment. The film holds your interest as you anticipate them "pushing the button." Yes, a couple people drinking coffee, ordering pizza, joking around can take you and your family out without spilling a drop. Now that is technology.
F-bombs. Covered sex scene from 5 miles up. No nudity.
Drones
2013
Action / Thriller
Drones
2013
Action / Thriller
Plot summary
Two Airmen are tasked with deciding the fate of a terrorist with a single push of a button. As the action plays out in real time, their window to use a deadly military drone on the target slowly closes. With time running out, the Airmen begin to question what the real motives are behind the ordered lethal attack.
Uploaded by: OTTO
Director
Top cast
Tech specs
720p.BLU 1080p.BLUMovie Reviews
COLLATERAL DAMAGE
Drone Warfare Or Video Games?
Powerful gripping drama with faultless acting from Mumford and O'Leary. SPOILER: The "iron" is only dropped when for Mumford it becomes personal. Okay, so O'Leary's role reversal isn't totally convincing but this is a drama about ideas and the positions people take to adjust to their situations. And of course we are left to wonder if the target was a terrorist.
Excellent film. Intense and thought provoking. Deserves a much better rating.
Not too many movies really make me think. This one did.
I don't know what motivated the people that made this film, but their work stuck me much deeper than I expected.
The main characters are two soldiers in a military installation where they are assigned to man a drone spy plane. They are searching for the "enemy" and when they find one the drone is equipped with weapons to "take them out." That's their job; find 'em and kill 'em. All with the push of a button.
Causing collateral damage (killing innocent civilians) is supposed to be just another part of the job. After all, the good outweighs the bad because the people they kill, will themselves kill even more innocents - think 911 - if they're not stopped.
This is a new form of warfare. In the "old days" you just dropped a bomb from the sky and never saw the people you incinerated. But now, super high definition cameras display the faces of the people you are about to turn into human hamburger on your computer monitor; up close and personal.
The drone team think they have spotted a super enemy. A high ranking member of the Al-Qaeda that is a must kill. There's only one problem: there are a house full of innocents at the same location. This includes women and children; even a baby.
Conscience begins to surface. Do they kill a dozen innocents to get this one enemy, or not? Think about what you know of Nazi soldiers who explained their actions by saying they were "just following orders."
The find and kill operation takes two people to complete. One cannot fire the kill shot without the other being in compliance. Listen to the kill or don't kill conversation between our two soldiers. Ask yourself the same questions that they ask. What would you do?
Don't get me wrong. I support the military. I am grateful for the men and women that have made the decision to; if necessary, lay down their lives to defend and protect this country. That means your life, my life, and the lives of all the people we know and love. Many heroic men and women have already laid down their lives in the service of their country. They deserve to be honored, they deserve our respect, they deserve our gratitude. They have mine.
But this film raises moral questions about how we fight Al-Qaeda that did not exist when we fought our enemies of the past. Push button warfare. How much "collateral damage" is acceptable? Is it acceptable at all? Is there a point of depreciating returns where we become as bad; or even worse than our enemies?
Take a look at the IMDb listing of the "stars" of this film. See who is ranked first, second and third. There is a reason for it.