BloodRayne: Deliverance

2007

Action / Fantasy / Western

Plot summary


Uploaded by: FREEMAN

Director

Top cast

Jodelle Ferland Photo
Jodelle Ferland as Sally
Michael Paré Photo
Michael Paré as Pat Garrett
Brendan Fletcher Photo
Brendan Fletcher as Muller
Natassia Malthe Photo
Natassia Malthe as Rayne
720p.BLU
910.57 MB
1280*714
Finnish 2.0
R
23.976 fps
1 hr 39 min
P/S 2 / 8

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by siderite3 / 10

Realllllly baaaaaaddddd!

Some other comment of mine was deleted because some user got offended by what I had to say about this movie. And I didn't even use curse words. I wanted to, but I didn't.

This film is a complete waste of time. Nothing in it, starting with Natassia who looks worse than in any other movie I've seen her and ending with the plot, which is a black hole of scripts. The deeper you look in it, the more darkness you see. To sum it up: Bill the Kid is a vampire, Bloodrayne comes to town and is defeated a few times by vampirish hillbillies, then saves town. She uses guns now, although she carries her cheap looking and useless blades.

The game BloodRayne was nice. Play it if you find it. You just slash and shoot and kill and if your health is down you suck some poor Nazi blood and get the health back. Really good for anger management. The first BloodRayne movie had Kristanna Loken in it and it made sense a little. This one is probably the transition to a version of the movie that is closer to the game, set in Nazi Germany, but is so utterly useless!

Bottom line: avoid at all costs. Waste of time.

Reviewed by TheLittleSongbird1 / 10

Vampires in the wild west

'Bloodrayne 2: Deliverance' was seen out of curiosity to see if they were as bad as its terrible reputation, like the other two films in the trilogy. As well as seeing whether one of the worst directors of all time Uwe Boll was capable of making a good film. Something was slightly intriguing though about the premise for the film, it did sound cheesy and didn't think to myself "hey maybe this could be a guilty pleasure".

No such luck. The first 'Bloodrayne' was awful and deserving of its reputation. So is 'Bloodrayne 2: Deliverance', both with the same flaws pretty much that deciding which is worse between the two is very difficult. Came to the conclusion watching the first film that Boll is incapable of making a halfway decent film. That feeling has not changed at all here. As someone who is usually very generous rating and reviewing films, 'Bloodrayne 2: Deliverance' is down there with the worst sequels but doesn't have the issue of disgracing the original film with the original film here not being good in the first place. Everything is abysmally executed and there are no redeeming qualities at all, have said that about very few films seen recently.

'Bloodrayne 2: Deliverance' once again couldn't be worse on a visual level. Photography that is both chaotic and static, bacon-slicer-like editing, drab costumes that don't fit the setting, continuity errors galore (more than anybody can count),afterthought-like visual effects, lighting completely lacking in atmosphere, those can all be found. The music is never dynamic with anything on screen, often working against it and like it belonged in another film entirely, on top of that it is very unpleasant to listen to.

Writing is atrocious beyond belief, it doesn't flow and the cheesines gets far too much, enough to make one want to vomit and again became exhauted by the amount of unintentional camp there was. The action has no momentum or excitement whatsoever, is chaotically edited, under-rehearsed choreographically and a lot of it is incomprehensible. It really takes ineptitude to a whole new level. As is the story, it never comes to life and is not easy to follow often. Boll's direction is typically non-existent and cold, comparing him to Ed Wood is rather insulting when although Wood's films were the complete opposite of fine heart one could see that he had his heart in the right place (something that has never been the case with Boll). The characters are walking cliches that are neither interesting or worth rooting for, instead bland and irritating.

Acting is not much better. The lead Natassia Malfe is a little superior, at least there is a little more emotion, but one doesn't remember her very much afterwards. Meanwhile the rest of the cast provide far too much ham that one can bear, Michael Pare especially over-compensating.

Overall, awful first sequel and certainly does not stop the heart. 1/10 Bethany Cox

Reviewed by claudio_carvalho5 / 10

Boring Adventure

A gang of vampire cowboys led by Billy the Kid (Zack Ward) attacks the inhabitants of Deliverance, kidnapping their children. When the Dhampir Rhayne (Natassia Malthe) arrives in the homestead of her friends to pay a visit, she finds them dead and their children missing. The lonely cowboy Pat Garrett (Michael Paré) tells that Billy the Kid is the responsible for the slaughter and offers to team-up with Rayne. However she refuses his offer and heads alone to the town. She is defeated by the vampires and rescued by Pat Garrett that saves her life. Together they team-up with the dishonest The Preacher (Michael Eklund) and with the scum Slime Bag Franson (Michael Teigen) and return to Deliverance to face Billy the Kid and his vampire gang.

"Bloodrayne II: Deliverance" has a promising premise and beginning, with the saga of the Dhampir (child of a vampire father and a human mother in Balkan folklore that has vampire powers and none of the weaknesses) Rayne in the Wild West that unfortunately is not well executed and turns in a boring adventure. The stylish cinematography is very beautiful but the pace is totally inadequate to an action movie, with excessive use of slow motion, long and dull dialogs and annoying music score. My vote is five.

Title (Brazil): "Bloodrayne 2: Libertação" ("Bloodrayne 2: Liberation")

Read more IMDb reviews