Not One Reviewer, as of this Date, Posted a Remark about...
(1) The NASA "Air-Brush" Brigade. This Assault on the Truth has been Reported by NASA Employees for Decades who have either Taken Part in the "Cover-Up" or have Witnessed the Before and After Photographs First Hand. Why would NASA do this? Just for Fun?
(2) Buzz Aldrin REFUSING to even LOOK at a Photograph. This Reminds of the Catholic Church REFUSING to LOOK through Galileo's Telescope.
(3) The Famous "Brooking's Report" Think Tank Warns...(paraphrasing)"If Proof of Extraterrestrial Existence is Discovered, Keep it from the Public".
If Nothing Else, this Far from Smoking Gun Proof Documentary, Exposes those bits of FACT about what goes on in the UFO Research Community and Why it is Difficult at Best and Impossible at Worst to Approach the Subject with a Clear Head.
There is so much Resistance, Cover-Ups, Misdirection, Misinformation, Disinformation, and Ballyhoo that has to make one Wonder just what is the Agenda Motivating all of the Smokescreens.
Skeptics and Trolls are Quick to Ridicule and Poke Fun at the Researchers but give the "Authorities" a Pass at any and all Chicanery. NASA, for example and the "Government" are Taxpayer Funded and Answerable to the Citizens and Their Duty is to the Public.
Maybe the Infamous "Brookings Report" (sighted, by the way, in this film) was Correct, or at Least those in Charge to this Day Believe it to be Correct and We are all being Pampered and Corralled into the "Party Line". Move On Sheeple, Nothing to See Here, We have this Under Control for Your Own Good. We are "Definitely Looking Out for You."
Aliens on the Moon: The Truth Exposed
2014
Action / Sci-Fi
Plot summary
Freedom of information allegedly released several moonscapes from Apollo 1 -17. Astronauts and scientists are interviewed about what appears to be large colonies and facilities, on the moon. This is a decide for yourself documentary. Some contributors suggest Apollos 18,19 and 20 actually were launched to investigate alien activity!
Uploaded by: FREEMAN
Director
Top cast
Tech specs
720p.WEB 1080p.WEBMovie Reviews
The NASA Air-Brush, Buzz Aldren's Hubris, & "The Brookings Report"
Not bad
Makes some very interesting viewing. This movie seems to actually prove that not only do aliens exist but are still there. There may even be more than one set of aliens that are actually fighting each other. Now if they are why is the earth being left alone? Too primitive perhaps?? The newly released unretouched photos when compared to the retouched ones does seem to show structures and possible space craft that are not man made. Why haven't the astronauts said anything? Buzz Aldrin is one still alive but he just says he doesn't want to get involved in the discussion. Does he know too much and is he terrified of aliens? Who knows??
Inexplicable doku, uhm, mockumentary..? Inexplicable, who put it there!? Clearly artificial.
Be prepared for a lot of this: We are presented with a huge photograph of the moon, while zooming in the narrator says: "look at this inexplicable photo". So far, you have no clue what you're supposed to be seeing. Then they highlight something, or ring around something that might, just miiiight look like some sort of structure. Then an "expert" says: this is clearly not natural, but WHO put it there?! And you're left thinking, uhm, couldn't it just have been a mountain or crater or a rock or something..? I mean, there are thousands of moon photos, it's all rock and sand and stuff, of course a bunch of 'em will look like stuff.
One time in particular, they showed the same photo several times in a row, and before the colored highlight came on, I couldn't for the life of me see where the alleged structure was supposed to be. Haha.
Anyway! I'll say though, some of it is kind of interesting. But keep in mind that it might very well be a mockumentary. It's fun to hear the interviews with former employees at NASA etc. but whether they are who they say they are, or whether they are telling the truth or just wants their 15 minutes, is not good to know.
One lady gives a rational explanations for one of the photos, and the narrator quickly brushes it off as a poor attempt at explaining this inexplicable photograph. That's just silly.
Had they just presented all the material, all the pictures and interviews at once, in stead of showing the same picture about 300 billions times, the whole thing could have been 20 minutes. Tops!
but yeah, to sum up, I found it entertaining for the most part, but also really low brow, and quite stupid. Take it for what it is, light conspiracy-ish entertainment, and you'll, well, you could do worse.