There were some fairly interesting things caught by the expedition, and a couple of the people working on the movie are very knowledgeable, but the horrendous, public domain soundtrack and sensationalising vocabulary used by Corey et al ruined what could have been a decent watch. Karaaaaaaaaaazy, increeeeeeeedible, worrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrld changing, amaaaaaaaazing and woooooooooooow, the discoveries were not. Kind of interesting and worth following up on, they were. The tech nerd who owned most of the kit was great, but do all UFO movie makers go to the same History Channel sponsored film school? No wonder so many serious people still laugh at a very serious subject. Waaaaaaaaaaay overpriced at 4 bucks. The grift continues while we still remain in the dark about what a very real phenomena actually is. Shame.

A pseudoscientific potpourri revolving around world famous UFO clips, TicTac, Go fast and Gimball. If you have seen the clips there is very little here except lots of talk about modern video/audio recording devices. Flooding the viewer with lots of acronyms and super scientific sounding small talk does not make this science.

We are shown dots in the sky in different colour ranges next to original navy clips and later on nonsense graphs while the "scientific crew" try to get their cellular phones to work. "Could this be another tictac?" Yeah, I guess they could also be mast lights from Catalina island, satellites or falling stars. Maybe even superman, like Shatner suggest playfully, hinting exactly how much he is into this specialist role of his.

Shatner is almost awake while performing though later on he has trouble to stay on cue where he is supposed to act excited or say "Crazy!" when he is presented a normal cloud formation, claiming it is something very "crazy". Earlier in the document we are suggested it is a wormhole. Wormhole. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

I feel sympathy for the naval officer who was connected to original clips and seems very sad and troubled but you can see him being sad and troubled in many other interviews where he tells the story in depth and personally. Nothing new here.

Michio Kaku gets about 3 minutes of screen time which mostly consist of clips from earlier documentaries. 1 star comes from including his famous quote (also from another interview): Next time you are "abducted", steal something.

The whole premise of this film is to try to get better footage of the UFOs that were filmed in 2004 near Catalina island (the famous Nimitz case with the Tic Tac UFO) by going to the same location with all kinds of expensive gear for 5 days.

Unfortunately, they were not able to capture anything conclusive. Basically just a hole in the clouds with blinking lights at night that they call a "wormhole".

All their footage is more grainy than the original FLIR videos from the Navy.

As if they filmed with an iphone through night vision goggles... Oh wait, they did.

But they still decided to follow through with the film project (to recoup some of the money they spent I guess).

They also use William Shatner's name to try to lure viewers even though he doesn't really contribute anything.

Even him, the professional actor, can't seem to manage to be excited about the footage and sound convincing when he says it's "craaazy".

I also feel like there was no need for the director to feature herself so prominently in the film.

I'm still giving it 3 stars for the project itself and the efforts that went into it. It could have turned out better if they'd been lucky, but the results they got were not conclusive enough to deserve a film, in my opinion.

If you want to watch a good documentary about UAPs, just watch The Phenomenon by James Fox.

And if you want some evidence of the existence of something else out there, just smoke DMT.